Here at the Academy, plebes (the freshman year cadets) have various duties that they perform. One of these is calling minutes for formations. Basically, starting a certain number of minutes before any given formation, we stand against the wall and give a prescribed speech about the uniform and time until formation. What we say goes like this:
Attention All Cadets! There are ___ minutes until assembly for _______ formation! The uniform is ________. ______ minutes remaining!
We start with the 5 minute call 10 minutes before formation (why, I still don’t understand) and end with the 2 minute call, which looks a little different than the others:
Attention All Cadets! There are 2 minutes until assembly for _______ formation! The uniform is ________. This is the last minute to be called for this formation. Do not forget your lights. 2 minutes remaining!
So, the last few weeks, we’ve had some problems with minutes. Not having everyone calling (there are a certain number of plebes that must call for each formation, spread throughout the company area), calling at the wrong time, calling the wrong uniform, etc. Our First Sergeant (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TldPQFRtgek) decided that the best solution was for 100% of plebes to call minutes, and for our team leaders to be forced to stand with us while we call.
Problem: a lot of team leaders don’t care, and haven’t been standing with their plebes. So yesterday, 1SG walked through one portion of our area, saw all the missing team leaders, and called them out at the formation. Since West Point preaches strict adherence to the honor code, and he already had a pretty good idea of who wasn’t with their plebes already, common sense and decency would dictate that when he told any team leader who wasn’t with their plebe for minutes this morning to meet him at the back of the formation, that they would do so, knowing that they had done the wrong thing.
Following a series of events that were not to the knowledge of the plebes at large, we received an email from 1SG, asking us to email him with whether our team leader had been on the wall with us that morning. To say the least, I was appalled. While I would certainly tell him the truth, regardless of my team leader’s actions, I did not believe it was the right answer to test our honor, and use it test the honor of our team leaders.
As I was in a foul mood after learning that my Chemistry lab had become corrupted, I responded to his request (as I was writing, I received an email from my team leader, explaining why she had not been on the wall that morning, as she normally is). It went like this, and I apologize for my angry grammar and poor revision:
1SG King
First Sergeant
I do not understand why our honor must be used to test the honor of our team leaders? I do not think that is fair to us as plebes, that if our team leader cannot be honorable, that we have to come clean for them.
CPL Barnhart was not on the wall with me this morning. Instead, she was talking to the TAC.
Very Respectfully,
Cadet David Johnston
Company F-4, USCC
Scott 5352
GO FROGS!
S1/Secretary – USMA Amateur Radio Club, W2KGY
I received a response shortly thereafter. A simple, “Noted.”
I like to think that he then thought about the abrasiveness of that response considering my e-mail’s tone, and replied again that if I would like to talk about it, he would happy to talk with me anytime yesterday, as a fellow cadet.
I did go and speak with him. Suffice it to say, a certain team leader was the major issue. Granted he was in a tough situation, but he admitted that his solution was probably not the best one. He was also prior service, though he never made it out of the DLI (Defense Language Institute). It was nice to sit down and discuss it with him at the same level, and it was interesting to see his perspective, especially since it wasn’t as high-and-mighty as I had previously thought.
Overall, I think I learned a lot of things from this, and I think some of the other parties involved did as well.
Michael